The Science of Reading is a comprehensive body of research that spans multiple disciplines, including education, psychology, neurology, and linguistics. It synthesizes decades of research on how individuals learn to read, which skills are involved, and how these skills work together in the brain. This research provides evidence-based practices for teaching foundational literacy skills, especially for students with reading challenges such as dyslexia.
One of the core principles of the Science of Reading is that effective reading instruction is built around five critical pillars of literacy:
Phonological Awareness: The ability to recognize and manipulate sounds in words. This foundational skill is key to decoding and word recognition.
Phonics: Teaching the relationship between letters and sounds. Phonics instruction helps students break down words into their component sounds, which is crucial for accurate reading and spelling.
Fluency: Developing the ability to read smoothly, accurately, and with expression. Fluency is built through practice and repetition, allowing students to read more effortlessly.
Vocabulary: Understanding the meaning of words and how to use them. A strong vocabulary helps students with both reading comprehension and effective communication.
Comprehension: The ability to understand and interpret the meaning of text. Comprehension strategies involve connecting ideas, making inferences, and integrating new information with prior knowledge.
At The Teacher Tutors, we take pride in ensuring that our reading instruction follows these research-based guidelines. Our teachers utilize proven strategies such as explicit phonics instruction, phonological awareness exercises, fluency-building drills, vocabulary development, and comprehension strategies—all of which are essential components of effective reading intervention. These are not just techniques; they are backed by decades of research and are proven to make a significant impact.
Our teachers have already made a remarkable difference for hundreds of children, both with and without dyslexia. By applying the five pillars of literacy, we provide each student with a well-rounded, evidence-based approach to reading. Whether they’re struggling with decoding, fluency, or comprehension, we tailor our instruction to meet each child’s unique needs. We know that no two students are the same, and our personalized strategies help students thrive in their reading journey.
The Science of Reading has shown us that effective reading instruction is about more than just following one specific program or approach. What matters most is the use of scientifically backed methods that can be adapted to meet individual needs. Our teachers are skilled in these strategies, and we are dedicated to providing high-quality, evidence-based reading interventions to help students succeed.
If you’re looking for expert support in reading instruction that is grounded in research and proven to make a difference, The Teacher Tutors is here to help.
References
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to Print: Language Essentials for Teachers. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
International Dyslexia Association (IDA). (2017). Knowledge and Practice Standards for Teachers of Reading. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/knowledge-and-practice-standards/
The Reading League. (2020). The Science of Reading: A Defining Guide. Retrieved from https://www.readingleague.org/
Shaywitz, S. E. (2003). Overcoming Dyslexia: A New and Complete Science-Based Program for Reading Problems at Any Level. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Kilpatrick, D. A. (2015). Essentials of Assessing, Preventing, and Overcoming Reading Difficulties. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). Interventions for children’s reading difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(4), 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02423.x
Comments